Publication Type:

Journal Article

Source:

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Volume 9, Number 3, p.ZC12-ZC14 (2015)

URL:

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84923814345&partnerID=40&md5=ba5afe2910ac49045977361c5ceef275

Keywords:

acrylic acid resin, aromatic polyamide, article, biocompatibility, carbon fiber, Compressive strength, controlled study, denture base, Flexural modulus, Flexural strength, Glass, parameters, poly(methyl methacrylate), polyethylene

Abstract:

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the flexural strength, the flexural modulus and compressive strength of the acrylic polymer reinforced with glass, carbon, polyethylene and Kevlar fibres with that of plain unfilled resin. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 specimens were prepared and divided into 10 specimens each under 5 groups namely group 1- control group without any fibres, group 2 – carbon fibres, group 3- glass fibres, group 4 – polyethylene, group 5- Kevlar. Universal testing machine (Tinius olsen, USA) was used for the testing of these specimens. Out of each group, 5 specimens were randomly selected and testing was done for flexural strength using a three point deflection test and three point bending test for compressive strength and the modulus was plotted using a graphical method. Statistical analysis was done using statistical software. Results: The respective mean values for samples in regard to their flexural strength for PMMA plain, PMMA+ glass fibre, PMMA+ carbon, PMMA+ polyethylene and PMMA+ Kevlar were 90.64, 100.79, 102.58, 94.13 and 96.43 respectively. Scheffes post hoc test clearly indicated that only mean flexural strength values of PMMA + Carbon, has the highest mean value. One-way ANOVA revealed a non-significant difference among the groups in regard to their compressive strength. Conclusion: The study concludes that carbon fibre reinforced samples has the greatest flexural strength and greatest flexural modulus, however the compressive strength remains unchanged. © 2015, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. All rights reserved.

Notes:

cited By 0

Cite this Research Publication

T. Ca Thomas, Kumar, KaAswini, Mohamed, Sb, Krishnan, Va, Mathew, Aa, and Manju, Va, “The effect on the flexural strength, flexural modulus and compressive strength of fibre reinforced acrylic with that of plain unfilled acrylic resin – an in vitro study”, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 9, pp. ZC12-ZC14, 2015.