Publication

Abstract : Peer-to-Peer and client-server network models have been investigated as data transfer methods, the literature has not yet completely documented their advantages and disadvantages, especially for stability. The primary objective of this study is stability restrictions in network systems, and it compares the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and Client-Server architectures in great detail. By comparing the performance in important measures while maintaining stability limitations, the goal is to determine which design is better. In particular, the research examines the two designs bandwidth, throughput, packet loss rate, and retransmission rate. It shows that the Client-Server design performs better in terms of throughput, bandwidth, and retransmission rates, demonstrating reliable data handling and effective delivery within specified intervals. Peer-to-peer architecture, on the other hand, shows an advantage with a reduced packet loss rate, indicating potential resistance against interruptions during data delivery. The study’s final results helps in making accurate choices in choosing an architecture for network systems that best satisfies with stability criteria.