Publication

Abstract : This review examined 28 studies to understand how political economy analysis (PEA) is conceptualized and applied in health. Definitions of political economy varied, with only 11 studies offering explicit definitions. Most commonly, political economy was framed as the study of power, interests, institutions, and ideas shaping health policy processes and outcomes. Applications ranged from analysing structural determinants of health to understanding stakeholder influence in health reforms. Across studies, 31 distinct frameworks and theories were used. Frequently employed models included Campos and Reich’s Political Economy of Health Financing Reform Framework, Harris’s Applied PEA, and the DFID and World Bank ‘How-to’ notes. Theoretical underpinnings were drawn from economics, political science, and sociology—such as historical institutionalism, stakeholder theory, and discursive institutionalism—highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of PEA. Health issues analysed through a political economy lens primarily included health financing, governance, human resources for health, and service delivery. PEA was used to explore challenges such as policy reform feasibility, institutional capacity, health workforce equity, and donor dependency. The rationale for applying PEA included uncovering the influence of actors, navigating complex political contexts, and enhancing policy implementation. Overall, PEA in health is marked by conceptual diversity and methodological pluralism. Its growing application reflects the need to understand the interplay of politics, institutions, and economics in addressing systemic health challenges.