Back close

Device-Associated Infection Rates in 20 Cities of India, Data Summary for 2004–2013: Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium

Publication Type : Journal Article

Publisher : Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Source : Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology

Url : https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2015.276

Campus : Faridabad

School : School of Medicine

Year : 2015

Abstract : OBJECTIVETo report the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium surveillance data from 40 hospitals (20 cities) in India 2004–2013.METHODSSurveillance using US National Healthcare Safety Network’s criteria and definitions, and International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium methodology.RESULTSWe collected data from 236,700 ICU patients for 970,713 bed-daysPooled device-associated healthcare-associated infection rates for adult and pediatric ICUs were 5.1 central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs)/1,000 central line–days, 9.4 cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAPs)/1,000 mechanical ventilator–days, and 2.1 catheter-associated urinary tract infections/1,000 urinary catheter–daysIn neonatal ICUs (NICUs) pooled rates were 36.2 CLABSIs/1,000 central line–days and 1.9 VAPs/1,000 mechanical ventilator–daysExtra length of stay in adult and pediatric ICUs was 9.5 for CLABSI, 9.1 for VAP, and 10.0 for catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Extra length of stay in NICUs was 14.7 for CLABSI and 38.7 for VAPCrude extra mortality was 16.3% for CLABSI, 22.7% for VAP, and 6.6% for catheter-associated urinary tract infections in adult and pediatric ICUs, and 1.2% for CLABSI and 8.3% for VAP in NICUsPooled device use ratios were 0.21 for mechanical ventilator, 0.39 for central line, and 0.53 for urinary catheter in adult and pediatric ICUs; and 0.07 for mechanical ventilator and 0.06 for central line in NICUs.CONCLUSIONSDespite a lower device use ratio in our ICUs, our device-associated healthcare-associated infection rates are higher than National Healthcare Safety Network, but lower than International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium Report.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37(2):172–181

Cite this Research Publication : Yatin Mehta, Namita Jaggi, Victor Daniel Rosenthal, Maithili Kavathekar, Asmita Sakle, Nita Munshi, Murali Chakravarthy, Subhash Kumar Todi, Narinder Saini, Camilla Rodrigues, Karthikeya Varma, Rekha Dubey, Mohammad Mukhit Kazi, F. E. Udwadia, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Sweta Shah, Arpita Dwivedy, Anil Karlekar, Sanjeev Singh, Nagamani Sen, Kashmira Limaye-Joshi, Bala Ramachandran, Suneeta Sahu, Nirav Pandya, Purva Mathur, Samir Sahu, Suman P. Singh, Anil Kumar Bilolikar, Siva Kumar, Preeti Mehta, Vikram Padbidri, N. Gita, Saroj K. Patnaik, Thara Francis, Anup R. Warrier, S. Muralidharan, Pravin Kumar Nair, Vaibhavi R. Subhedar, Ramachadran Gopinath, Afzal Azim, Sanjeev Sood, Device-Associated Infection Rates in 20 Cities of India, Data Summary for 2004–2013: Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2015.276

Admissions Apply Now